[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Brett Bergquist updated DERBY-6510:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: prstat.log

This is the output from running "prstat" on the server while the issue was 
occurring.  The prstat was run periodically over a 1 minute period.  The Derby 
PID is 4551 in the output,  the other Java PID is Glassfish.

> Deby engine threads not making progress
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6510
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
>         Environment: Oracle Solaris 10/9, Oracle M5000 32 CPU, 128GB memory, 
> 8GB allocated to Derby Network Server
>            Reporter: Brett Bergquist
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: dbstate.log, derbystacktrace.txt, prstat.log, 
> queryplan.txt
>
>
> We had an issue today in a production environment at a large customer site.   
> Basically 5 database interactions became stuck and are not progressing.   
> Part of the system dump performs a stack trace every few seconds for a period 
> of a minute on the Glassfish application server and the Derby database engine 
> (running in network server mode).   Also, the dump captures the current 
> transactions and the current lock table (ie. syscs_diag.transactions and 
> syscs_diag.lock_table).   We had to restart the system and in doing so, the 
> Derby database engine would not shutdown and had to be killed.
> The stack traces of the Derby engine show 5 threads that are basically making 
> no progress in that at each sample, they are at the same point, waiting.
> I will attach the stack traces as well as the state of the transactions and 
> locks.   
> Interesting is that the "derby.jdbc.xaTransactionTimeout =1800" is set, yet 
> the transactions did not timeout.  The timeout is for 30 minutes but the 
> transactions were in process for hours.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to