[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim Haase updated DERBY-6527:
-----------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Oops, I think I see what you mean. You are talking about a delete
analogue to the following statement about the update rule:
"When a value in a column of the dependent table is updated, and that value is
part of a foreign key, NO ACTION is the implicit update rule."
So I gather it is correct to say exactly the same thing for delete --
"When a value in a column of the dependent table is deleted, and that value is
part of a foreign key, NO ACTION is the implicit delete rule.")
> Fix errors in foreign keys documentation
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6527
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6527
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Attachments: DERBY-6527-2.diff, DERBY-6527.diff, rrefsqlj13590.html,
> rrefsqlj13590.html
>
>
> Cf this email thread:
> http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/Foreign-key-semantics-as-documented-td138227.html
> Our documentation in the reference manual on foreign keys/referential actions
> has errors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
