[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-280?page=comments#action_12358945 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-280: -------------------------------------- In an earlier comment you mentioned a valid query which worked before the patch which now fails with: ij> select a+1 as a, a+1 as a from bug280 group by a; ERROR X0A00: The select list mentions column 'A' twice. This is not allowed in queries with GROUP BY or HAVING clauses. Try aliasing one of the conflicting columns to a unique name. There was a discussion of whether this new failure was worth introducing given the seriousness of returning wrong results. A choice of the lesser of evils I thought, regress an edge case rather than return wrong results. But I might have been mistaken. > Wrong result from select when aliasing to same name as used in group by > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-280 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-280 > Project: Derby > Type: Bug > Components: SQL > Reporter: Bernt M. Johnsen > Assignee: Rick Hillegas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bug280.diff > > Wrong result from select when aliasing to same name as used in group by. > Example: > If we have the following table: > ij> select * from tt; > I |J > ----------------------- > 1 |2 > 2 |3 > 1 |2 > 2 |3 > 2 |3 > > > 5 rows selected > The following select is ok: > ij> select i, count(*) as cnt from tt group by i; > I |CNT > ----------------------- > 1 |2 > 2 |3 > > > 2 rows selected > But this one returns wrong result in the aliased column: > ij> select i, count(*) as i from tt group by i; > I |I > ----------------------- > 1 |1 > 2 |2 > > > 2 rows selected > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
