[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14018688#comment-14018688
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6598:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks for the patch, Kim. I'd probably not mention it in the REMOVE_JAR topic.
At least it shouldn't say that the procedure can be used to install code, since
it does the exact opposite. Apart from that, all the changes look good to me.
> Document permissions recommendations for JAR procedures
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6598
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
> Reporter: Kim Haase
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Attachments: DERBY-6598.diff, DERBY-6598.stat, DERBY-6598.zip
>
>
> It's been recommended that we should make the documentation of the
> SQLJ.INSTALL_JAR procedure (and SQLJ.REPLACE_JAR) state more explicitly that
> the privilege should only be granted to trusted users. For example:
> "Since this procedure can be used to install arbitrary code that runs in the
> same Java Virtual Machine as the Derby database engine, the execution
> privilege should only be granted to trusted users."
> This needs to go into the Reference Manual topics on these procedures as well
> as other locations where they are discussed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
