[jira] [Created] (DERBY-6668) Truncating a table may silently violate a deferred foreign key.

[Rick Hillegas (JIRA)]

Rick Hillegas created DERBY-6668:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Truncating a table may silently violate a deferred 
foreign key.
                 Key: DERBY-6668
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6668
             Project: Derby
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: SQL
    Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
            Reporter: Rick Hillegas


If you truncate a table which is referenced by a deferred foreign key, orphaned 
tuples are left in the foreign table. That is, the foreign key is violated but 
no exception is raised.

Since table truncation involves changing conglomerate ids, this may be another 
case of derby-6665. Or this may be a new bug.

The following script shows this behavior:

{noformat}
connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;create=true';

create table tunique
(
  a int not null unique
);

create table tref
(
  a int references tunique( a ) initially deferred
);

insert into tunique values ( 1 );
insert into tref values ( 1 );

truncate table tunique;

-- the unique table is empty
select * from tunique;

-- but the table which references it has a row
select * from tref;
{noformat}




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)