[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14064940#comment-14064940
 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6665:
-------------------------------------------

The constraint UUID should work in all three cases, yes. The table id is used 
for CHECK constraint so that all constraints for a single table are stored in 
the same bucket, which makes it easier to validate all the CHECK constraints 
with one scan of the table at the transaction boundary. So there may be some 
extra refactoring needed to get it completely regular.

> Violation of deferred constraints not detected when conglomerates are shared
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6665
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6665
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>         Attachments: junit.diff
>
>
> See the following script:
> {noformat}
> ij version 10.11
> ij> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;create=true';
> ij> create table t1(x int primary key);
> 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> create table t2(x int primary key);
> 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> create table t3(x int, constraint fk1 foreign key (x) references t1 
> initially deferred, constraint fk2 foreign key (x) references t2 initially 
> deferred);
> 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> insert into t1 values 1;
> 1 row inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> autocommit off;
> ij> insert into t3 values 1;
> 1 row inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> insert into t2 values 1;
> 1 row inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> delete from t1;
> 1 row inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> commit;
> ij> select * from t1;
> X          
> -----------
> 0 rows selected
> ij> select * from t2;
> X          
> -----------
> 1          
> 1 row selected
> ij> select * from t3;
> X          
> -----------
> 1          
> 1 row selected
> {noformat}
> Since T3.X contains a value (1) that is not present in T1, the foreign key 
> FK1 is violated, and the COMMIT statement should have failed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to