I am working through the 10.11 backport query. It needed some more work
as it missed 10.10 bugs fixed in different releases. Also am
doing a quick triage to see which bugs are not appropriate for 10.10
backport and adding labels. If anyone disagrees with my initial
assessment please add comments on why and just remove the label.
/mikem
On 9/24/2014 3:13 PM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in backporting suitable fixes from trunk to the 10.11 and
10.10 branches.
I've modified my existing query for backporting to 10.10
'derby_10_10_backport_query':
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326503
This currently results in 108 rows.
I've also created a similar query for backporting to 10.11:
'derby_10_11_backport_query':
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12329357
This currently results in 11 rows.
If you spot something wrong with these queries let me know.
If you can join me in backporting please pick issues from the list,
reopen, assign yourself, do the back port and afterward reassign the
original owner and close.
If it is found an issue cannot or should not get backported, please tack
on the appropriate 'derby_backport_reject_10.10' or
'derby_backport_reject_10_11' label.
Thanks,
Myrna
