--- Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Levitt wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Derby-391 has a comment in it that I'd like to > > separate out into a new issue. > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-391 > > > > John Embretsen writes: > > "I believe the following boolean ij properties are > not > > mentioned in the documentation (tools guide) > either: > > ij.showNoConnectionsAtStart > > ij.showNoCountForSelect > > (I noticed that these properties are used in > > > trunk/java/tools/org/apache/derby/impl/tools/ij/utilMain.java)" > > > > > > > > I would like to create a new JIRA issue and place > > John's comment there, because I do not have enough > > information yet to create the documentation for > those > > properties. However, I do have enough to create > > documentation for the first three properties > mentioned > > in this issue, and I would like to submit a patch > to > > add those and resolve this issue if approved. > This > > way, the patch does not get held up. Does anyone > have > > any objections to that? John? If not, I'll > create > > the new issue, add a comment to it asking for more > > info (that I can use very soon to add docs for if > > someone provides that info) and then add a comment > to > > this issue referring to the new one. Finally, I > can > > submit a patch for this issue :) > > > You could also submit a patch for the first three > properties and leave > the issue open. Incremental development applies to > the documentation as > well as the code. > > Dan. > > > Sounds reasonable. I'll submit the patch then. Thanks!
