[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14160938#comment-14160938
]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1040:
-------------------------------------------
Note that a number of the remaining .sql files listed here are currently run
through StoreScriptsTest.
> Run store locking tests with network server and investigate locking behaviour
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1040
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1040
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Network Client, Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Labels: derby_triage10_8
> Attachments: DERBY-1040_LockTableVtiTest.diff
>
>
> The store locking tests should be run with network server, locking behaviour
> investigated, and a perhaps a proposal made for testing locking with network
> server. For network server, the pre-fetching of data causes diffs in the
> tests and I am not sure if this is expected or not. I noticed for example
> such diffs in updatelocks.sql and readlocks.sql.
> Below is the list of locking tests I see in store. Feel free to take one or
> two and file a subtask.
> EscalateLock.sql
> RowLockBasic.sql
> RowLockIso.sql
> TableLockBasic.sql
> TableLockBasic.subsql
> lockTableVti.sql
> readBtreeCursorLocks.subsql
> readBtreeSetLocks.subsql
> readCursorLocks.subsql
> readSetLocks.subsql
> readlocks.sql
> updateBtreeCursorLocks.subsql
> updateBtreeHoldCursorLocksJDBC30.subsql
> updateBtreeSetLocks.subsql
> updatecursorlocks.subsql
> updateholdcursorlocksJDBC30.subsql
> updatelocks.sql
> updatelocksJDBC30.sql
> updatesetlocks.subsql
> RowLockIso.sql
> rlliso1multi.sql
> rlliso1multi.subsql
> rlliso2multi.sql
> rlliso3multi.sql
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
