[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-6786:
-----------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: So this is where the column mapping seems to go wrong but the comment
seems to say that if this work was not done, the mappings will be wrong. Here
is the code from JoinNode.java:getMatchingColumn:603
/* Insert will bind the underlying result sets which have
* tables twice. On the 2nd bind, resultColumns != null,
* we must return the RC from the JoinNode's RCL which is above
* the RC that we just found above. (Otherwise, the source
* for the ColumnReference will be from the wrong ResultSet
* at generate().)
*/
if (getResultColumns() != null)
{
for (ResultColumn rc : getResultColumns())
{
VirtualColumnNode vcn = (VirtualColumnNode)
rc.getExpression();
if (resultColumn == vcn.getSourceColumn())
{
resultColumn = rc;
break;
}
}
}
The if condition above will be false for the test case with no INSERT. But in
case of INSERT, we will go inside the if code and regenerate the virtual nodes
with different column positions. This code has been in there since 10.1
codeline and may be that explains why this has failed all the way back in 10.1
codeline)
> NullPointerException in INSERT INTO statement with multiple subselects
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6786
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6786
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.2.2.0, 10.5.1.1, 10.8.2.2, 10.9.1.0, 10.10.1.1,
> 10.11.1.1
> Environment: not relevant, but tested under Windows 7 32bit, Windows
> Server 2008 64bit, Java 6 and Java 7.
> Reporter: Johannes Stadler
> Labels: NullPointerException
> Attachments: acaaeec04ex014axaa2ex076bx000000c72a081.java, repro.sql
>
>
> Hello,
> I'm getting this wrapped NullPointerException when I try to execute an INSERT
> INTO SQL statement:
> java.sql.SQLException: The exception 'java.lang.NullPointerException' was
> thrown while evaluating an expression.
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory40.java:101)
> at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Util.java:148)
> at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.seeNextException(Util.java:349)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.wrapInSQLException(TransactionResourceImpl.java:431)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.handleException(TransactionResourceImpl.java:353)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.handleException(EmbedConnection.java:2400)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.ConnectionChild.handleException(ConnectionChild.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeStatement(EmbedStatement.java:1437)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.execute(EmbedStatement.java:711)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeLargeUpdate(EmbedStatement.java:190)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeUpdate(EmbedStatement.java:179)
> at
> de.foconis.dakobp.unittests.div.TestMain.testNullpointer(TestMain.java:49)
> at de.foconis.dakobp.unittests.div.TestMain.main(TestMain.java:28)
> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: The exception
> 'java.lang.NullPointerException' was thrown while evaluating an expression.
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory.java:42)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.wrapArgsForTransportAcrossDRDA(SQLExceptionFactory40.java:125)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory40.java:71)
> ... 12 more
> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Java exception: ':
> java.lang.NullPointerException'.
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory.java:42)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.wrapArgsForTransportAcrossDRDA(SQLExceptionFactory40.java:125)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory40.java:71)
> at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Util.java:148)
> at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.javaException(Util.java:370)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.wrapInSQLException(TransactionResourceImpl.java:436)
> ... 10 more
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.derby.exe.acf81e0010x014axa9c2x46e6x000000c6dc781.e2(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.services.reflect.DirectCall.invoke(ReflectGeneratedClass.java:105)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.ProjectRestrictResultSet.getNextRowCore(ProjectRestrictResultSet.java:275)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.ProjectRestrictResultSet.getNextRowCore(ProjectRestrictResultSet.java:263)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.DMLWriteResultSet.getNextRowCore(DMLWriteResultSet.java:127)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.InsertResultSet.open(InsertResultSet.java:519)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.executeStmt(GenericPreparedStatement.java:461)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.execute(GenericPreparedStatement.java:340)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeStatement(EmbedStatement.java:1344)
> ... 5 more
> Most likely this bug has already been reported as DERBY-5041, which has
> already been closed (although I don't use a GROUP BY clause).
> The original statement is quite complex and partially generated, but the
> error can be reproduced easily, using a statement as simple as this:
> insert into t
> select erg.* from (
> select d1.s from (select k,s from k1) as d1
> right join (select k,s from k2) as d2 on d1.k = d2.k
> ) as erg
> where s > 10
> I will attach the file "repro.sql", containing all SQL statements required to
> reproduce it (including the CREATE TABLEs).
> These are my investigation results:
> Conditions
> -------------
> 1. the outermost statement must NOT be a SELECT (e. g. INSERT)
> 2. there has to be a outer join in the subselect, where at least one dataset
> has no join partner
> 3. an outer SELECT must have a restriction (WHERE clause) and access a column
> from the table, that did not have a join partner
> Error state
> -------------
> The NullPointer occurs inside a generated class. So i enabled the Debug
> Option "DumpClassFile", to get the generated class file (the decompiled java
> class file will also be appended).
> The method "e2", stated in the StackTrace, performs the restrction "where s >
> 10". Therefore it calls getColumnFromRow() with its resultSetNumber.
> This is where the error occurs: there is no "current row" available.
> Precisely, the "row" property of the activation class at the specified index
> (which is the resultSetNumber=3 in this example) is not set.
> It gets a bit complicated now, I will try to explain it, starting with the
> generated resultset hierarchy.
> This tree of resultset implementations is generated to perform the query:
> Implementation resultSetNumber
> ------------------- ---------------------
> InsertResultSet -> none
> ProjectRestrictResultSet -> 5
> ProjectRestrictResultSet -> 4
> HashLeftOuterJoinResultSet -> 0
> TableScanResultSet -> 1
> HashTableResultSet -> 3
> TableScanResultSet -> 2
> The HashTableResultSet, which got the resultSetNumber 3 doesn't set a current
> row, because there is no join partner (still everything correct). But the
> ProjectRestrictResultSet on position 4 uses the restriction method ("e2"),
> which accesses a column on resultSetNumber 3 -> error.
> As far as I can tell, a restriction must never relate to the source of an
> outer join ResultSet. The numeration error does not occur, if the outermost
> statement is a SELECT and the numeration is generated top-down.
> Unfortunately I couldn't find an easy solution for this problem. In my case,
> this is a critical bug, because changing the query as workaround is
> difficult, since parts of it are generated. Please note, that this error is
> not dependent on any environment settings or platform and occured with all of
> the abolve mentioned versions. I didn't test the versions from 10.6 to 10.7,
> but probably those are also affected.
> If you require any further information, please let me know. I'm able to
> perform a build, so I wouldn't need a full version, a patch would be
> sufficient.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
