[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14566531#comment-14566531
 ] 

sagar commented on DERBY-6809:
------------------------------

Ok, started some preliminary work ... this is going to take time ...

Firstly, I do understand that PARALLELISM for each and everything will end up 
doing more harm than good ... 

I am  on this, first in theory ...

1. Can there be something as intelligent PARALLELISM? 

2.  Newer facilities in JAVA8, is it only to make code readable? Fewer lines of 
code?

3. Is the PARALLELISM real in STREAMS and LAMDAS or is it pseudo pr as 
mentioned here http://coopsoft.com/ar/Calamity2Article.html#para is it 
PARAQUENTIAL?

4. In a multithreaded environment such as J2EE Servlet Container, a Connection 
pool and then DERBY as a network server ... will PARALLELISM within the DERBY 
CODE ITSELF be blocking affect performance or will it benefit?
Can there be newer techniques which can be thought of which will remove the 
perceived demonstrated and theoretical drawbacks?

Will work on the above first ... seek answers of my own ... and wait for a lot 
of inputs and words of wisdom too ...

Sagar



> Java 1.8 feature use
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6809
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6809
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 11.0.0.0
>            Reporter: sagar
>
> Suggestion ...
> Is it possible to auto modify the existing source code using tools like 
> Netbeans, and take advantage of the new features in JDK 1.8 for better 
> multiuser performance and better utilization of current day multicore 
> processors?
> Plainly put, can we have from 11.0 onwards a version of derby which takes 
> advantage of the advancements and new features in java 1.8 ... 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to