|
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: I suppose that is another way to solve the problem... When I filed the bug in Jira, what I proposed would have been sufficient for me. If you or Mamta have itch for a different solution, that is fine too. But I wouldn't expect users to want to skip 100,000 values by issuing that many failed inserts. That is usually done by ALTER TABLE command, that sets START WITH option. While Derby already supports changing INCREMENT BY using ALTER TABLE, I think there is a pending enhancement to enhance ALTER TABLE to allow setting STARTS WITH value.Satheesh Bandaram wrote: Satheesh |
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over user inserted values in... Satheesh Bandaram
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over user inserted valu... Bryan Pendleton
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over user inserted ... Mamta Satoor
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over user inser... Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over user i... Mamta Satoor
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over u... Mamta Satoor
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping ov... Mamta Satoor
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping over u... Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: [Derby-359]Skipping ov... Mamta Satoor
- Re: [Derby-359]Skippin... Satheesh Bandaram
- Re: [Derby-359]Skippin... Daniel John Debrunner
