[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xavion updated DERBY-6841:
--------------------------
Attachment: 10.12.1.1-Fresh.txt
10.12.1.1-Hard.txt
10.12.1.1-Soft.txt
10.11.1.1.txt
It looks like you've hit the nail on the head there: hard-upgrading the
databases to v10.12.1.1 solved the problem. I'm surprised that the massive
performance difference caused by soft-upgrading hasn't been spotted by someone
previously. Ironically, the problem wouldn't have impacted me much anyway. My
databases are automatically regenerated on a weekly basis by whatever Derby
version is installed at the time :-).
I've attached the results of the latest round of tests. The filenames are
fairly self-explanatory, but I'll quickly outline their meanings anyway:
* 10.11.1.1.txt: The tests were run on v10.11.1.1 databases using v10.11.1.1.
* 10.12.1.1-Soft.txt: The tests were run on v10.11.1.1 databases using
v10.12.1.1 via soft-upgrading.
* 10.12.1.1-Hard.txt: The tests were run on (previously) v10.11.1.1 databases
using v10.12.1.1 after hard-upgrading.
* 10.12.1.1-Fresh.txt: The tests were run on (new) v10.12.1.1 databases using
v10.12.1.1.
> Derby v10.12.1.1 is horribly slow compared to v10.11.1.1 in embedded mode
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6841
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6841
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC, SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.12.1.1
> Environment: OS: Windows, OS X, Linux
> CPU: Quad-Core Intel i5
> App: Swing, multi-threaded
> Reporter: Xavion
> Fix For: 10.11.1.1
>
> Attachments: 10.11.1.1.txt, 10.12.1.1-Fresh.txt, 10.12.1.1-Hard.txt,
> 10.12.1.1-Soft.txt, DERBY_6841.java
>
>
> It takes much longer to open, read, and close embedded databases using
> v10.12.1.1 than it did with v10.11.1.1. What ever changes you guys made over
> the last year and a bit have definitely been for the worse.
> Below are the results of the repetition tests I've just run on the same
> computer with the same databases. Let me know if you need to know about the
> sizes of the databases and/or the file type they contain.
> Connecting with v10.11.1.1:
> Database opened in 0.82 seconds.
> Database opened in 0.77 seconds.
> Database opened in 0.88 seconds.
> Database opened in 0.77 seconds.
> Database opened in 0.77 seconds.
> Database opened in 0.96 seconds.
> Database opened in 0.74 seconds.
> Connecting with v10.12.1.1:
> Database opened in 1.98 seconds.
> Database opened in 2.07 seconds.
> Database opened in 1.97 seconds.
> Database opened in 2.01 seconds.
> Database opened in 2.01 seconds.
> Database opened in 2.00 seconds.
> Database opened in 2.03 seconds.
> Reading with v10.11.1.1:
> Database processed in 6.17 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.00 seconds.
> Database processed in 3.67 seconds.
> Database processed in 3.66 seconds.
> Database processed in 3.78 seconds.
> Database processed in 3.69 seconds.
> Database processed in 3.74 seconds.
> Reading with v10.12.1.1:
> Database processed in 7.29 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.54 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.88 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.65 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.34 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.35 seconds.
> Database processed in 4.50 seconds.
> Disconnecting with v10.11.1.1:
> Database closed in 0.11 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.13 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.15 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.14 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.10 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.13 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.14 seconds.
> Disconnecting with v10.12.1.1:
> Database closed in 0.74 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.87 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.76 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.87 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.85 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.69 seconds.
> Database closed in 0.84 seconds.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
