Thanks, Dan. I'm having trouble getting the handles on archived
messages. Kathey sent a message with the following ids:
Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-499) Expose BOOLEAN datatype to
end users
Date Fri, 09 Dec 2005 03:19:58 GMT
In that message, she said she was happy with incremental improvements
and the only objection she wanted addressed was the removal of
unnecessary datatype constants. In the meantime, Satheesh has replied on
this email thread that his objections have been addressed.
Thanks for volunteering to commit this patch.
Regards,
-Rick
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I have merged in changes to the mainline which accumulated over the last
week. Keeping the patch evergreen involves a certain amount of work and
I would appreciate it if a committer could submit this patch soon. I
understand that this is a busy time of year for most people on this list.
Hi Kathey,
I know that you are busy, but could you take 15 minutes to verify that
the revised patch satisfies your blocking objection? You wanted me to
scrub from DRDAConstants.java the unnecessary extra datatypes. I have
done that. If you certify that the patch passes your objection, then
another committer may feel confident to follow through on the heavy
lifting of checking in these changes.
Hi Satheesh,
Could you also take 15 minutes to review the parser changes and certify
that the patch satisfies your objection?
I'll look at this patch, but I can't commit it if there's an outstanding
-1 vote on it. Rick could you provide links in the archive of those two
objections.
Dan.
