On 12/19/05, Bryan Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
When I worked on DERBY-614, I added a testcase for it
to testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/derbynet/prepStmt.java
Does that seem like a reasonable place to add these additional
test cases?
my 2 c: from your description, it would make sense for 125 and 170. But maybe 491 and 492 could be better placed in lang/procedure.java or jdbcapi/resultset.java tests, even though you worked on network server behavior...
Another option is to create a brand new test.
Note that the tests for bugs 491 and 492 involve both some
client-side Java code, and some stored procedure code. Should
I add the stored procedure code to
testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/util/ProcedureTest.java?
Well...
The current test harness does not separate out the client and server code...but it might be nice in case we want to do this in the future to at least have a different file for the one vs. the other...On the other hand, it may make things more easy to oversee if each test has the code for the procedures it needs.
ProcedureTest.java was really created to be used from test lang/procedure.java. I think subsequent test writers have mostly been using the procedures there in other tests rather than write new ones with similar signatures - but I haven't verified this for every use.
Myrna
