[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Pendleton closed DERBY-6900.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 10.13.0.0
Confirmed in the online docs. Closed.
> docs build for ref.html gives errors about rrefjavstateautogen.dita --
> possible typo?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6900
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6900
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Bryan Pendleton
> Fix For: 10.13.0.0
>
>
> When I run 'ant html.ref' in the docs trunk, I get this error:
> {quote}
> [xslt]
> /extra/derby/docs/trunk/DITA-OT1.1.2.1/xsl/preprocess/topicpull.xsl:327:75:
> Warning! Can not load requested doc:
> /extra/derby/docs/trunk/temp/rrefjavstateautogen.dita (No such file or
> directory)
> [xslt]
> /extra/derby/docs/trunk/DITA-OT1.1.2.1/xsl/common/output-message.xsl:43:16:
> Warning! ------------------------------------------------------------------
> [xslt] IDXS059E Error: (File =
> /extra/derby/docs/trunk/temp_source/ref/refderby.ditamap, Element =
> topicref:278)
> [xslt] The file
> file:///extra/derby/docs/trunk/temp/rrefjavstateautogen.dita is
> [xslt] not available to resolve link information. Either the
> file could not
> [xslt] be found, or a DITAVAL file was used to remove the
> file's contents.
> [xslt] Be aware that the path information above may not
> match the link in
> [xslt] your topic.
> {quote}
> Digging into the refderby.ditamap SVN history, it looks to me like the
> refrence to rrefjavstateautogen.dita was added by revision 1643722,
> as part of DERBY-6753.
> That revision also added a new file named crefjavstateautogen.dita,
> which seems to have a very similar, but not idential, name ('cref*'
> rather than 'rref*').
> I wonder if this is just a typo, and the changes in 1643722 should have
> been referring to crefjavstateautogen.dita, not rrefjavstateautogen.dita.
> Or, possibly, there were supposed to be two new files added by that
> revision (both rref and cref), and the revision ommitted an svn add for
> one of those files?
> More research is needed, but it seems like some follow-up work is
> probably worth doing here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
