[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16413152#comment-16413152
]
The Alchemist commented on DERBY-6991:
--------------------------------------
Thank you, [~rhillegas]. I didn't know about there was a "standardized"
LISTAGG, thank you for educating me.
Can we limit the scope of this issue to just supporting a {{character value
expression}} and ignore the {{listagg separator}}?
After multi-arg UDAs (DERBY-6992) are added, then we can come back and extend
LISTAGG to support the full standard?
> GROUP_CONCAT
> ------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6991
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6991
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.15.0.0
> Reporter: The Alchemist
> Priority: Minor
>
> I was wondering what it would take to get {{GROUP_CONCAT()}} support.
>
> If someone points me in the right direction, I can send a patch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
