+1 to a 10.15.2 maintenance release.

I have no particular opinion about Java 9 versus Java 11 (in many of
my environments I am still using Java 8/Derby 10.14 quite
successfully, in fact.)

bryan

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:47 AM Davide Grandi <davide.gra...@email.it> wrote:
>
> May be
> 10.15.2          realeased with Java 9
> 10.15.3-SNAPSHOT in development with Java 11 (or whatever is the next
>                   development name)
> ?
>
> Bye,
>
>      Davide
>
> On 05/01/2020 18:48, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> > It's been a year since we produced a Derby release. No significant
> > feature work has gone into the code since then. But I would be happy to
> > manage a 10.15.2 maintenance release in order to roll up the handful of
> > bug fixes which have accumulated over the last year.
> >
> > The only reason I can see for a new feature release would be to advance
> > the minimal JVM version to the Java 11 LTS version. According to
> > convention, this would require a vote by the community. I am not
> > planning any work over the next year which would require Java 11
> > features, so I don't personally see any compelling reason for advancing
> > the JVM version.
> >
> > What are your thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Rick
>
> --
> Ing. Davide Grandi
> email  : davide.gra...@email.it
> mobile : +39 339 7468 778

Reply via email to