Thanks for that explanation, Bryan. No, I don't see anything improper. I just wanted to make sure that feedback from the other projects was being collected. Thanks.

On 10/2/21 7:17 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Thanks Rick. Recently, following a suggestion by Craig R, I've been
using the project dev lists (derby-dev, jdo-dev, torque-dev) instead,
for two reasons: firstly, there's generally nothing sensitive in our
reports to the board, so it's nice to use the broader and more
inclusive development lists to incorporate feedback from the entire
community; second, each development team has their own
project-specific activities which is nice to capture on the
development lists.

Do you think this is an improper approach?

bryan

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 7:30 AM Rick Hillegas <rick.hille...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have nothing to add. Did you want to send this message to the DB pmc
mailing list also? I didn't receive a copy addressed to that list.

Thanks,
-Rick

On 9/30/21 11:46 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, I am preparing the October report for the Board.

Can you please send me any updates that I should include?

Here is what I currently have.

The DB project received a report of a CWE-502 vulnerability in the
retired DdlUtils source code. Although the DdlUtils subproject is
retired and no longer actively developed, the DB project decided
to address the vulnerability, which is now tracked as CVE-2021-41616,
and removed the insecure source code from the source repository.
The DB project also removed the DdlUtils-1.0 release from
distribution via the Apache mirrors, and updated the DdlUtils web
site to make it more clear that DdlUtils is retired and no longer
actively developed.

The JDO team have published the JDO 3.2 spec (or is it still in review?)

The JDO team have been making changes suggested by the Apache
Diversity Conscious Language Checker, including changing the
name of the git branch from master to main, and investigating
language changes in the source code and specification.

The Derby team have validated Derby behavior with Java 17. This
involved significant work to address changes due to JEP411.


Reply via email to