Ole Solberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: >> "David W. Van Couvering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>I just noticed that in the latest tinderbox run that storetests had an >>>800% increase in the time it took to run compared to (some baseline?). >>> >>>I think we should also get an alert email sent when a given suite is >>>more than 150% (or does someone have a better number) of the baseline. >>> >>>Comments? >> Sorry about that. I just happened to stress test a patch of mine on >> the same machine as the tinderbox test was running on. >> > > I have checked the history of 'storetests': > The increase occurs from 2005-12-01 - svn 351569/351543/"Fix for > DERBY-715" which added a new test:"... Added a test that causes 5 > deadlocks..." > http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/TinderBox_Derby/UpdateInfo/351569.txt > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-715 > > I guess the increase is explained by this.
You're right, the storetests suite has had about 800% for a long time. Just for your information, the tinderbox tests that my stress testing interfered with were revision 370531 (913%) and 370662 (940%). What do these numbers mean? Do they compare the current run with the average of all runs? -- Knut Anders
