I'll have a look at it and possibly commit it....

>>>>>>>>>>>> Knut Anders Hatlen wrote (2006-01-25 09:59:36):
> "Bryan Pendleton (JIRA)" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> >      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-491?page=all ]
> >
> > Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-491:
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> >     Attachment: svn_jan_24_2006.diff
> >
> > Updated patch, against latest trunk. I added a few additional
> > comments to this patch to try to explain the changes more clearly,
> > and also I added a reference to this bug entry to help the reader
> > find more information. Now that DERBY-125 has been committed
> > (thanks!), the regression test passes cleanly, and I have also run
> > the entire derbyall suite with this patch.
> >
> > I think that this patch proposal is now ready for review. Kathey,
> > Army, other interested reviewers, please have a look and tell me
> > what you think!
> 
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> I read through your patch, ran derbynetclientmats and derbynetmats
> successfully, and verified that the test case failed without your
> patch (actually, it didn't fail, it just hung until I got bored and
> killed the test).
> 
> The changes seem correct to me, they are well documented and the test
> case looks good. I have no complaints at all about the patch.
> 
> +1 to committing this patch.
> 
> -- 
> Knut Anders
> 

-- 
Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, 
Staff Engineer, Technical Lead Derby/Java DB
Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway

Attachment: pgpmh9QJN3CNJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to