It appears to still be failing on JDK 1.5 on Solaris x86, see
http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Derby/testlog/CYGWIN_NT-5.2_i686-unknown/374142-derbylang_diff.txt
Since it's not occurring on all platforms I will downgrade this to Major.
David
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
Thanks Mike.
I agree, if we did not get the needed info (scenario, repro etc.) for
DERBY-749 all this time, I see no reason why it has
to be kept critical.
For DERBY-830, can David please confirm if it is still a valid issue and
need to remain open. From the comments
the test seem to pass for Dan on XP.
-Rajesh
On 2/2/06, *Mike Matrigali* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
As to DERBY-749 I have requested multiple times more information, and
not gotten anything. Given that it is likely to get closed with no
fix intended.
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was reviewing the list of open JIRA issues for Derby and
noticed there
> are some 'Critical'
> issues that remain 'Unassigned'.
>
>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10594&priority=2&resolution=-1
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10594&priority=2&resolution=-1>
>
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10594&priority=2&resolution=-1
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10594&priority=2&resolution=-1>>
>
> Does anybody have any comments or plan to work on the following?
>
> Type JIRA ID Summary
> Assigned
> Updated
>
>
> Test DERBY-830 lang/dcl.sql is failing
> Unassigned 20/Jan/06
> Bug DERBY-749 Corrupt Database after high cpu usage
> Unassigned 14/Dec/05
> Bug DERBY-616 create index can fail under the SecurityManager
> Unassigned 11/Oct/05
> when trying to access files in the tmp
> folder of
> a database
>
> In addition, for the following issue there has been no updates
for some
> time.
> Scott, can you please share your progress, if you are actively
working
> on this.
>
>
> New DERBY-396 Support for ALTER STATEMENT to DROP , Scott
> 28/Dec/05
> Feature MODIFY, RENAME a COLUMN
> MacDonald
>
>
> The following issues of regression failure were discussed on
derby-dev -
> the v10.2
> behavior seems appropriate and the v10.1 tests needs to be fixed.
> Having said that,
> I don't think they need to remain 'Critical' anymore.
>
>
> Bug DERBY-881 jdbcapi/LOBTest.java fails for server (
10.1.2.2 <http://10.1.2.2>
> <http://10.1.2.2/>) Unassigned 31/Jan/06
> and client (10.2.0.0
<http://10.2.0.0> <http://10.2.0.0/>)
> compatibility testing
>
> Bug DERBY-880 jdbcapi/connectionJdbc20.java fails for server
> (10.1.2.2 <http://10.1.2.2>
<http://10.1.2.2/>) and client
> (10.2.0.0 <http://10.2.0.0> <http://10.2.0.0/>)
compatibility Unassigned 31/Jan/06
> testing with > SQLSTATE(null):
> java.sql.SQLException: Stream of
column value
> in result cannot be retrieved twice
>
> Going forward, I suggest any issues (specially Bugs, Test failures)
> marked 'Blocker' or 'Critical' needs
> to get the immediate attention to be evaluated for assigning
(have an
> owner) or marking (the priority)
> accordingly. Any regression test failures would fall into this
category.
>
> I can volunteer to monitor and send follow-up mails, for
addressing the
> high priority
> Derby issues, on a regular basis.
>
> Regards,
> Rajesh
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard