[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-570?page=all ]
Eric Radzinski updated DERBY-570:
---------------------------------
Attachment: (was: rrefsqlj30118.html)
> wrong java.sql.Type id implied for LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-570
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-570
> Project: Derby
> Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Versions: 10.1.1.0
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Attachments: derby570-2.diff, derby570.diff
>
> The Datatypes section of the Reference Manual says that LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT
> DATA is identical to VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA but does not give a jdbc type,
> implying that LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA has the same jdbc type as VARCHAR FOR
> BIT DATA, i.e., VARBINARY. This section should say that LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT
> DATA has the following jdbc type: LONGVARBINARY.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
