David W. Van Couvering wrote:
OK, thanks. I hadn't considered the RS metadata.
Just a note that the result set metadata should match the defined results _exactly_. Returning an int where a short is expected, or a char where a varchar is expected, or a nullable column where a "not null" column is expected, etc. etc. can cause existing applications a lot of problems--see DERBY-107. Our JDBC tests might not catch it, but my past experience is that ODBC applications (esp. Microsoft ones like Access) will throw a fit if something is even slightly off...
Army
