[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dan for the continued progress on my favorite issue. I am
looking forward to studying the patch sometime to actually understand
it, but in the meanwhile I just looked at the little stuff.
1) On the javadoc I found that eclipse generates javadoc like this,
but Rick reported that it actually causes a warning because there is
nothing after the @return
* @param pc
+ * @param additionalBytes
+ * @return
+ */
2) Would it make sense to bump up the starting value of the loop in the
test, now that you have made so much progress?
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 200 parameters
PASS: Logical operators with 200 parameters
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 300 parameters
PASS: Logical operators with 300 parameters
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 400 parameters
PASS: Logical operators with 400 parameters
-FAILED QUERY: Logical operators with 500 parameters.
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 500 parameters
+PASS: Logical operators with 500 parameters
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 600 parameters
+PASS: Logical operators with 600 parameters
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 700 parameters
+PASS: Logical operators with 700 parameters
+PASS: PREPARE: Logical operators with 800 parameters
+PASS: Logical operators with 800 parameters
+FAILED QUERY: Logical operators with 900 parameters.
