"Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <[email protected]> writes: > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-821?page=comments#action_12365387 > ] > > Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-821: > -------------------------------------- > > I looked at the server side Changes: > Regarding the JCC check in DRDAStatement, Bryan said >> perhaps it's worth >> looking at this a little while longer, to see if there is a way to handle >> this without having to add the session pointer to the database object; maybe >> you could instead arrange to pass the session pointer as an argument when >> you call isRSCloseImplict? > > I think it would be better to just have it take a boolean and > centralize the differences for AppRequesters in AppRequester.java > with supportXXX() methods there. In this case, If we can get the > JCC side fixed the condition will have to be modified further to > include version info. It is best to have that all in one place I > think.
I agree. For now, I will treat CCC the same way as JCC (i.e., don't change the behaviour). > There was a question on negative testing for protocol. There is a > test testProtocol.java which has a file protocol.tests where you can > put tests for protocol sequences that will never actually be sent > from the client. Thanks! I'll have a look at that test. -- Knut Anders
