On 2/7/06, Satheesh Bandaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right... I think this specific issue could use a sub-task.
Satheesh
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> A separate doc sub-task would be easier to reliably track. As it is,
> DERBY-310 has lots of linked tasks, which would make it easy for doc
> updates to fall through the cracks, especially since a section in
> DERBY-310 lists several doc sub-tasks.
>
> A doc subtask to DERBY-911 would definitely keep it on the doc radar.
>
> -jean
>
>
>
