TomohitoNakayama wrote: > Hello. > > About this issue, I think we should be very careful about removing any > sign of problem... > > My intention is to add test implemented by DERBY-511, compensating for > ignoring shutting down exception in DERBY-273. > > My position was watching response of other persons for DERBY-511 ... > Well ... There were almost no response . > DERBY-511 was not on my radar at all. Checking in a separate test for this seems like a great idea so I say go ahead. I won't have time to review it today.
With or without DERBY-511, for DERBY-273, suppressing the console output is much better than disabling the entire test as has been proposed. Kathey
