Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> OK, I was being dense. :-) This happens to YOU too? :-) >To rephrase to ensure I understand, you want to implement functions that >are defined by the SQL standard, whose functionality is currently >implemented by JDBC escape functions. In some cases (not 'all', that was >throwing me) the SQL function is implemented in Derby today by function >with the same name as the JDBC escaped function name. > >Sounds great, these would be all new Jira enhancements, nothing to do >with DERBY-591. > > Right... Not my itch at the moment. Bernt, can you file a different JIRA issue for this? Satheesh >Sorry for any confusion, >Dan. > > > > >
