Dag H. Wanvik wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>>>"Daniel" == Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Daniel> Was this posted, the more detailed solution? > Daniel> > Daniel> There was a little more detail on a proposed interaction with online > Daniel> compress, but I think that is based upon a whole lot of design > thinking > Daniel> and assumptions which has not made it to list. > > We will submit a detailed description of the approach with the first > patch for DERBY-690 (embedded SUR); it should be ready for upload any > day now. This should hopefully provide enough context for the > reviewers.
That's great. I would encourage in the future bringing designs and ideas to the derby-dev list before undergoing a serious coding effort. If the design is based upon a wrong assumption then it can mean a lot of wasted effort for everyone. Everyone should treat the derby-dev list and the folks on it as a great resource and your team members. I do have concerns with "We will submit a detailed description", this implies to me that there is a team of folks working on this design without talking to the list. I guess you have every right to do this, but it's not realy open source development, and in my eyes does not build merit in the Apache way. Thanks, Dan.
