Kathey Marsden (JIRA) wrote: > If I understand this correctly, if we go with 1) would the workaround > just be for the user to break up their batches into a few batches each > with less than 64K statements?
Yes, exactly so. > If so, I think 1) is fine for now. Great! That's the path I'll pursue. > We have bigger fish to fry with Network Server. Can you be more specific? Are there a few particular bugs you want to point me at? Or is it more a general feeling... thanks, bryan
