Kathey Marsden wrote:
> I think ultimately if we can support loading Derby in multiple class > loaders, we document how to do that, and we get our installed user base > doing it that way be default, we will have more flexibility. For now we > don't have it. Still I would vote -1 on this one. The ability to run in different class loaders, I believe, is not a "get of jail free card" for backwards compatibility. I don't want to applications written against Derby to have the be re-written to move up to a later version. Dan.
