Hi Mike, Mike Matrigali wrote:
> are 3 options: > 1) copy the code to the system procedure > 2) use the same method as offline compress, ie. add some internal > syntax so that the whole setup is just done by the parser. > 3) somehow call the alter statement node directly from "around" > the parser. I have no idea if this is possible, or how hard. I would vote for option 2) here... since we already have <ALTER> .... <COMPRESS> [ <SEQUENTIAL>] production in the parser. Would it be sufficient to add another token, like [ <OFFLINE> ] and switch the implementation at execution time? If so, much cleaner than 1) or 3), in my opinion. Satheesh > Any opinions on how to get the system procedure inplace compress > to share the alter table execution code? > > >
