Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>Seems strange to me to create a schema just to store the database owner, >does not seem natural or intuitive. Though, maybe I'm a little confused >by your description, you say "new system schema" and "new system >catalog", did you mean to say schema throughout? Though the last part of >the last sentence seems like what you are describing with SYSDBA. > > > Right... I meant to say "system schema" throughout... One place I seem to have mentioned catalog instead. Any reason why system schemas need to be owned by 'SA_USER_NAME', which is 'DBA'? Changing current system schemas authorizationId to database owner authorizationID seems to make sense to me. Satheesh
