Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>And this is a valid concern, which I understand. > >I think the question here boils down to: in what situations would a >third party ship derbytools.jar, and include it on the classpath with >a previous version of derbyclient.jar? Is that a good practice anyway? > >I don't have an immediate answer to either of those questions, >although my instict is to say "no" to the second one. > > > There was lots of talk in old code sharing threads about the potential for two different parties to have interaction and won't get into that here. I am not sure though about the potential for tools impact in these configurations. I think that might need some investigation. Kathey
