I like derbygo.jar or derbyrun.jar. I think it's advantageous for the
derby jars to sort together.
-- Michelle
Kristian Waagan wrote:
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
How about 'derbyutils.jar' ?
Hi Rajesh,
'derbyutils.jar' does not say me much. What is in there? To me it
sounds as it contains some additional programs/tools you can use
on/with Derby. Also, what's the difference between 'derbytools.jar'
and 'derbyutils.jar'?
Just my personal opinions :)
I think I'll join in on cheering for 'runderby.jar', or possibly
'derbyrun.jar'.
regards,
--
Kristian
-Rajesh
On 3/2/06, *Andrew McIntyre* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On 3/2/06, John Embretsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I
like
> derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings
about it
> :)
Eight characters is not a requirement. The idea is to capture the
functionality of the new jar file in as few characters as
possible, to
minimize typing. I'm open to suggestions, but I'd like to choose a
name as soon as possible.
derbyrun.jar is also currently my favorite, but that could
change. ;-)
andrew
