[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-999?page=comments#action_12368560 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-999: ------------------------------------------ Imho it should not have gotten into the suite. Instead of providing valid testing, it has provided extra work. It is a regular irritant because the test keeps failing with this jvm, and from the response by the creator on the list it is clear that the creator has little intent (no itch. :-) ) to correct this for ibm142, instead expecting it to be automagically fixed when the functionality goes in for full. > test SURTest.junit fails with ibm142 > ------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-999 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-999 > Project: Derby > Type: Bug > Components: Regression Test Failure > Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SURTest.diff, SURTest.out, SURTest.tmpmstr > > The test SURTest.junit fails with ibm142. > I'm attaching the .diff, .out, and . tmpmstr files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
