dumb question. Wouldn't I find it useful to have all the jar files
"munged" together besides use with a tool like ij? What's wrong with
"derbyall.jar"?
David
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 3/1/06, Stanley Bradbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having all the jars start with 'derby' has the advantage of making them
easy to search for and they will short together in an alphabetical
listing like is produced by most directory listings. Having them sort
together when listing out jarfiles in Server libdirectory or other jar
repository environment is really nice.
How about derbygo.jar ?
I agree with all of this as well. This is the problem with naming
things: there are often competing suggestions that each have their own
merit and none of them is necessarily the "right" one. They all would
work.
Anyway, I'll let this go a little while longer in case anyone else has
other good ideas.
andrew
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
