Rick Hillegas wrote:

Hi Kristian,

I believe you have run into DERBY-623. I am attaching a patched version of BaseMonitor which fixes this problem for me. I haven't' run derbyall against this yet so I can't verify that it's safe. But methinks it will work for you.

You are correct Rick. Thanks for the info!
I must take some time and search Jira (and the archives) before I post to dev next time I stumble over something that looks like a bug...

I just looked at the patch quickly, and it solves the problem in the same way I was thinking about. I will try it out. Any specific reason why the patch is not attached to DERBY-623 in Jira?

Also, the issue description indicates that there are already methods for reading system properties in privileged blocks "in the engine". Can anyone familiar with the code give a hint?


I would like to see this bug fixed, and I am willing to put some work into it (review, or possibly fix patch to use existing functionality), unless someone else has the itch for it. I suppose another part of the fix would be to remove the extra PropertyPermissions from the test security policy.



--
Kristian


Regards,
-Rick


Kristian Waagan wrote:

Hello,

I have run into a problem when running a JDBC4 JUnit test. The test is compiled with Mustang (Java 1.6), and all you need in the test for the problem to arise is a 'Class.forName("org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver")'.

When the above codeline is executed, a java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError is raised with the following cause: Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.util.PropertyPermission derby.debug.false read) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:321) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:546) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPropertyAccess(SecurityManager.java:1285)
        at java.lang.System.getProperty(System.java:652)
at org.apache.derby.impl.services.monitor.BaseMonitor.runWithState(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.impl.services.monitor.FileMonitor.<init>(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.iapi.services.monitor.Monitor.startMonitor(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.JDBCBoot.boot(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver.boot(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver.<clinit>(Unknown Source) ... 18 more



The code causing the error is only reachable in sane builds, and is located in 'impl.services.monitor.BaseMonitor.runWithState()':
if (SanityManager.DEBUG) {
    // Look for the derby.debug.* properties.
    if (applicationProperties != null) {
        // MODIFIED [snip]
    }

    // MODIFIED - The error happens here!
    addDebugFlags(System.getProperty(Monitor.DEBUG_FALSE), false);
    addDebugFlags(System.getProperty(Monitor.DEBUG_TRUE), true);    }


There are at least two workarounds; grant more permissions in the derby_test.policy file (without a codebase argument), or use a doPrivileged-block around the Class.forName() call.

However, the two options above do not seem right to me.
Can we move the doPrivileged-block down into the BaseMonitor class?
There is also a Properties variable in BaseMonitor named systemProperties, but glancing at the code tells me it might be null (haven't checked the consequences of that).


Can anyone advice on this?




--
Kristian



[snip - BaseMonitor patch]

Reply via email to