--- scott hutinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Levitt wrote: > > --- scott hutinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Since bookmarks and TOC (in url form) sort of > clash, > >> any good ideas > >> about where to put links (not bookmarks). > >> > >> I am thinking it might be wise to jump up to the > >> DITA-2.1 beta (except > >> for the build). Although my initial > investigation > >> into this showed a > >> difference in the globals that we use, which > broke > >> the build. Hopefully > >> it will fix some of the broken items, as xslt > gets a > >> bit messy (to me). > >> Also the FOP changes coming down the pipeline > seem > >> to have a direct > >> impact on what direction (I take) with fixes (ie > TOC > >> (table of contents)). > >> > >> Currently my build at work is having problems > >> (linux) from a fresh co > >> yesterday. > >> > >> Any ideas on the best method to do the switch? I > >> still have some > >> changes that haven't been incorporated into the > >> build, and are hanging > >> around somewhere. Possibly a working svn branch? > > >> XSLT debugging is > >> sometimes a pain to setup; depending on the build > >> target... > >> > >> thanks, > >> scott > >> > >> > > Hi Scott, > > > > I've played around with the DITA 1.2 (not 2.1, its > the > > other way around) :) a little bit these past few > > weeks. There are some problems with the java > files in > > it that they have submitted patches for, but you > need > > to get the dita source files, apply the patch, and > > recompile in order to get it working. Otherwise, > the > > toolkit doesnt build our Derby project. > > > > I agree that we should move to 1.2 though, as soon > as > > they release a binary distribution that includes > the > > patches. 1.2 handles links a lot better, as you > > stated, and it moves us closer and closer to not > > having to mod the xsl file each time. > > > > > > Hi Jeff, > Are those (or that) patch on the DITA-OT public > patches? If not, could > you send me the patch? > Yes, 1.2 (not 2.1). Sometimes I jump too far :-) I > don't have a > problem with re-building something, as that's the > norm isn't it? (just > kidding). I'll look at the patches at DITA-OT... > > thanks, > scott > Hey Scott, Here is the link to the info about the bug and the download for the patch they supplied to it. This is exactly the bug I get when I try to build derby docs using the 1.2 binaries. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1431229&group_id=132728&atid=725074
