Deepa Remesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 3/16/06, Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: >> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093?page=all ] >> >> Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1093: >> ---------------------------------- >> >> Attachment: upgrade.txt >> >> Based on the information in DERBY-573 I have run the runphases script to >> test upgrade. But I don't really understand the output (there's a lot of it) >> since it contains both "PASS" and "FAIL" and exceptions... I have attached >> the output here, so hopefully someone can have a look at it and tell me if >> there are any problems... > > Currently, we have to compare the output to the master file > phaseTester.out. Unfortunately, there are a lot of existing diffs when > you run this test with the trunk. There is a diff file attached to > DERBY-1076 which shows the exisiting diffs. It would be great if you > can take a look at this. It may not be easy to look through these > diffs since there are quite a few. I will also try to take a look at > your output and post to the jira if I find anything.
OK, thanks for the explanation :) I just saw another mail describing how the phaseTester master actually depends on the master for metadata.java. And since I have updated this master (the patch requires it) I cannot expect the phaseTester to run cleanly (even modulo the diffs described in DERBY-1076)... So there is not much point for you to look at the output either... But thanks again for taking the time to explain this :) -- dt
