>>>>>>>>>>>> Oyvind Bakksjo wrote (2006-03-21 12:11:41): > Hi folks, long time no see. :) > > I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time, > but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which Rick H > created and then closed himself during a discussion in October. I think it > would be nice if Derby behaved correctly according to the SQL standard here. > I see allowing nulls with unique constraints as a useful feature to have. > So, considering that I've been absent for quite a while, I don't know the > state of the nation and have to ask: Is this a feature the community would > like to have? Does anyone object to Derby behaving this way? And is anyone > working on this right now, considering working on it, or would like to?
+1 & Welcome back! -- Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, Staff Engineer, Technical Lead Derby/Java DB Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
pgptE11a5ZtH4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
