[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-953?page=comments#action_12371501 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-953: ------------------------------------------- I guess I just feel uncomfortable with swallowing *all* exceptions. Can you explain it to me like I were a novice why that's OK in this case? Why wouldn't it be better to check for the specific exception? > Add miscellaneous Statement methods introduced by JDBC 4 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-953 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-953 > Project: Derby > Type: New Feature > Components: JDBC > Reporter: Rick Hillegas > Assignee: Kristian Waagan > Fix For: 10.2.0.0 > Attachments: DERBY-953-1a.diff, DERBY-953-1a.stat, DERBY-953-2a.diff, > DERBY-953-3a.diff > > As described in the JDBC 4 spec, sections 13.1 and 3.1. > This adds support for new Statement methods added by JDBC4 and not addressed > by other JIRAs: isClosed() and getResultSetHoldability(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
