Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> On 3/28/06, David W. Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>I think this sounds like a good idea.  That said, I'm sure I'm missing
>>something, but can someone explain the difference between a snapshot of
>>the trunk in May and a snapshot of Derby 10.2 in May?
> 
> 
> Since trunk = 10.2, they would be one and the same thing. I think what
> Dan is suggesting is posting a snapshot of 10.2 alpha which includes
> the JDBC 4.0 driver once some significant portion of it has been
> implemented, so that the community-at-large can begin testing.

+1 snapshot of the trunk which currently is labelled as 10.2.

Dan.

Reply via email to