On 3/31/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is the other way around.  ":Existing Application Impact" is for
> things that are not regressions but  rather intentional behaviour
> changes or fixes that might affect existing applications. An example
> might be a bug fix that made Derby comply with standard behaviour where
> it did not before.    It may have existing application impact but is not
> a regression.

Ah, I see. I don't think that was clear from the previous comments.
I've added a checkbox for that as well.

andrew

Reply via email to