Thanks, Andrew. I was just setting up to run this test. I think your proposal is a winner.

Regards,
-Rick

Andrew McIntyre wrote:

On 4/12/06, Andrew McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As mentioned previously, why not go with 4.0? The RuntimeException
change only affects the mtGrammar parser used by the tests, no?

FWIW, i checked and the multi tests passed with a javacc 4.0-built
mtGrammar on jdk131. So I'd say go with 4.0.

andrew

Reply via email to