On 4/12/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am porting DERBY-614 to 10.1. Since I reopened it to port, I > assigned it to myself, but plan to reassign it to Bryan upon resolving > the issue as clearly the merit is all his for the wonderful fix. > > Is this the correct way to handle assignments when porting fixes made by > others to 10.1?
Sounds good to me. andrew
