"John H. Embretsen (JIRA)" <[email protected]> writes:
> [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1194?page=comments#action_12374701 > ] > > John H. Embretsen commented on DERBY-1194: > ------------------------------------------ > > Here is another suggestion which captures both interpretations of the > sentence "The Derby Network Server can run as a stand-alone server, > with Derby as an embedded part of the application.": > > "The Derby Network Server can either run stand-alone, that is as an > independent Java process embedding the Derby database engine, or > embedded within another Java application. In the latter ("embedded > server") setting both the Network Server framework and Derby are > loaded by the Java application." I like this wording better than those suggested so far in this thread, although I'd put "setting" in front of the parenthesized clause. However, this still fails to capture explicitly the fact that the embedding application can access Derby using the embedded driver while also offering access to other applications via the client driver and the server. Dag
