Jean T. Anderson wrote:

Stan Bradbury (JIRA) wrote:
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]

Stan Bradbury updated DERBY-913:
--------------------------------

   Attachment: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff
               4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf

Document patch submitted to be committed:

FILE:  4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff - the patch file:
  Adds Chapters 3 and 4
  Updates Chapters 1 and 2
  Updates build.xml to correct build problems on Linux

FILE:  4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf
 PDF document generated from the above patch files.  Can be used to review 
changes and additions.
...
The patch is failing with hunk failures on the build.xml, which is a
little odd since this is just the second patch and you're the only one
doing patches right now:

  patching file build.xml

  Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
  Hunk #2 FAILED at 36.
  Hunk #3 FAILED at 104.
  Hunk #4 succeeded at 154 (offset -3 lines).
  2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file build.xml.rej

Did you 'svn up' your working copy before creating the patch? I'll email
you the build.xml.rej separately.

-jean

Hi Jean -
I think the 'svn up' might be the problem - I performed an 'svn co' to refresh my local copy prior to making the changes and creating the DIFF - would this sync up my copy? I will read up on these commands and may follow-up with more questions. I'm a newbie to the PATCH process so please bear with me.

John pointed out a typ-O that I can also fix before creating the new patch. Should I delete the original DIFF file from the JIRA issue because it is not correct and should not be used?



Reply via email to