|
Hi Dyre, yes that is correct, if you are supporting those data types it is expected that the required methods are there in order to provide developers with a consistent set of methods. It does not make sense to just pick and choose especially seeing these data types have been around in JDBC for quite some time now. Lack of support will make it much more difficult for users to migrate from other backends which support those data types to Derby. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Lance J. Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
- Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don'... Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we... Lance J. Andersen
- Missing JDBC3 methods, was: [jira] Updated:... Rick Hillegas
- Re: Missing JDBC3 methods, was: [jira] ... Lance J. Andersen
- Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we... Daniel John Debrunner
- [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don... Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
- [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don... Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
- [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don... Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
- [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don... Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
- [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don... Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
